well people from blizzcon asked about it whilst playing protoss and found it wasnt their, they asked a blizz team member to find that they had been droped
We had a lot of units for the Protoss and we had to make some decisions for Blizzcon about what to keep and what to drop. The Reaver was by far the hardest call.
We are VERY aware of how some players feel about the Reaver. Frankly, we feel pretty passionately about it ourselves. The challenge of making a sequel to StarCraft is enormous. You will see us make (and unmake) a lot of decisions like this as we continue the development process together.
Thanks to everybody who posted their feelings on this issue. I don't know what is going to happen in the future, but your feelings on the Reaver have been heard.
- Dustin
found this on the b.net forums from a member so it may come bk
how could they do that? the reaver was one of the main weapons in the protoss arsenal. why didnt they kick something like, i dunno, anything else? even zealots would do
well the cut reavers because of the colossus, protoss didnt need the reaver because the colossus did the same amount of damage, and could kill more then one unit by one attack.
like the reaver could.
But i think it sucks too, i love the reaver.
up to now from the vids i still cant see how anyone would build the collosus. the reaver definitely killed things faster. the only reason ppl are saying the collosus is good is cause the only times they were officially shown off were against zerglings and marines, and those dont exactly have oodles of life and armour do they? see how they fare against zealots or siege tanks.