Loads of time or games?

[Nebulous]

Would you rather have loads of time to play games but only be able to buy two games a year, or be able to buy loads of games but never have much time to play them?

 

[Igba]

What's the essence of having so many video games that you can't be able to play? It's complete waste of time and money. I rather have 2 games and more time to play it.

 

[Shortie]

What would be the point of having way too many video games you can not play... wait.. saying that I do have a huge backlog, to be honest, but not enough time lol. In all seriousness though, if I was given the option of two games a year or loads of games and no time, I would choose the first option every time. As long as the games were fun and kept me going throughout the year, I would be fine with just those two.

 

[Mimi]

It's better that I have few video games to play but have enough time to actually play them. It doesn't add up buying so many games that you can't play. It's a waste of money.

 

[Nazzyi]

Would you rather have loads of time to play games but only be able to buy two games a year, or be able to buy loads of games but never have much time to play them?

Unfortunately, I already have the second option of being able to buy loads of games but never have much time to play all of them. My backlog is very daunting to be honest.

 

[James]

If I am able to enjoy playing just two games, I am very okay. That is what that matters instead of having many games and not being able to play them at the end of the day.